The Basics
In
1975, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
claimed exclusive jurisdiction over workplace safety and
health for all aircraft crewmembers. Unfortunately, this decision prevented the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) – the agency that
regulates the safety and health of most U.S. workers – from protecting aircraft
crewmembers.
On
May 8, 1990, AFA filed a petition for
rulemaking with the FAA that asked the agency to adopt selected
OSHA safety regulations and apply them to the crewmembers working in the
airline industry, addressing such areas as the recording and reporting of
injuries; access to employee exposure and medical records; right to
inspections; safety definitions; the handling of hazardous materials; personal
protective equipment; medical and first aid; fire protection, and toxic and
hazardous substances. In submitting this petition, AFA was attempting to fill
the void created when the FAA asserted jurisdiction over crewmember health and
safety without actually exercising that authority. Almost seven years after AFA
petitioned for rulemaking, the FAA finally responded on June 6, 1997 with a one
page rejection letter.
This
rejection was followed by extensive pressure exerted by flight attendants and
their unions, which led to the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on August 7, 2000 by FAA Administrator Jane
Garvey and OSHA Assistant Secretary Charles Jeffress. The MOU directed
FAA and OSHA to “establish a procedure for coordinating and supporting
enforcement … with respect to the working conditions of employees on aircraft
in operation … and for resolving jurisdictional questions."
Unfortunately, the January 2001 change of administration in Washington led to
lengthy delays implementing the MOU and, eventually, to a watered-down voluntary program that
failed to attract participants.
On
September 19, 2005, AFA filed a complaint in the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia against Secretary of Labor and the FAA
Administrator. AFA asked the court to issue an order declaring that the
FAA had failed to exercise its asserted jurisdiction to establish occupational
health and safety standards for flight attendants and crewmembers. As a
result, the Secretary of Labor failed to fulfill her statutory duty under the
OSH Act to ensure healthy and safe working conditions for flight
attendants. On May 22, 2006, the District Court dismissed AFA’s complaint
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that AFA’s claim was not
“ripe” for judicial review since the Union must first exhaust its
administrative remedies by petitioning for rulemaking with the FAA before it
can resort to judicial review.
AFA
appealed the dismissal, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit affirmed the district court. The appeals court ruled
that “because the Unions did not exhaust their administrative remedies, the
judgment of the district court dismissing the complaint is affirmed.”
For
decades, flight attendants have suffered from the lack of occupational safety
and health regulatory protections. Data obtained from the Department of
Labor’s Bureau of Labor
Statistics through
the year 2000 and for
2006 – 2009 show clearly that aircraft cabins are dangerous
workplaces, with flight attendant injury/illness rates many times higher than
those experienced by employees in private industry as a whole.
On
February 14, 2012, Public
Law 112-95 - FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 was signed
into law following years of Congressional inability to pass a comprehensive
bill to fund the FAA. This bill includes an important section that may soon
lead to meaningful safety and health protections for flight attendants working
in the cabin: Sec. 829. Clarification of memorandum of understanding with
OSHA. Sec. 829 requires the FAA to report to Congress within 6 months of
bill passage (i.e., by August 14, 2012) on milestones for completion of work
begun under the August 2000 MOU and to “initiate development of a policy
statement to set forth the circumstances in which requirements of the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration may be applied to crewmembers
while working in an aircraft.” This is an encouraging development, and AFA
intends to hold both agencies and the industry accountable for ensuring that
flight attendants working on aircraft in operation are covered by
comprehensive, regulatory safety and health protections.
On
November 30, 2012, the FAA first proposed
[UPDATE: and on December 7, 2012, the FAA published
the proposal in the Federal Register] a new policy for addressing
flight attendant workplace safety, which comes after AFA aggressively advocated
for Flight Attendant safety and health protections to be included in the FAA
reauthorization bill signed by President Obama in February 2012. The FAA/OSHA
draft policy statement can be viewed here.
The FAA
is requesting comments on or before January 22, 2013, and the AFA
Air Safety, Health and Security Department is planning to submit comments. [NOTE:
On December 21, 2012, the FAA announced an extension of the original comment
deadline, which was January 7, 2013, at the request of airline associations.]
AFA
Activity and Hot Topics
AFA-CWA media release, November 30, 2012: Flight
Attendants To Have Safety And Health Protections In The Cabin
AFA-CWA
press release, September 19, 2005: Flight Attendants File Suit Against
Federal Agencies.
Feb. 12, 2003 AFA Presentation: Flight
Attendant Injuries and Illnesses
Feb. 5,
2003 Letter: Transportation
Trades Dept., AFL-CIO, to Transportation Secretary Mineta & Labor Secretary
Chao
References to
News Articles
Feb. 24, 2003 Air Safety Week: Plea
for jurisdiction [AFA members-only
access]
Feb. 17, 2003 Air Safety Week: Flight
Attendants Injured at Four Times Overall U.S. Industry Rate [AFA members-only access]
More
Information
Nov.
30, 2012 FAA Press Release – FAA Proposes Policy to Improve
Flight Attendant Workplace Safety
Jul.-Aug. 2002 Cabin Crew Safety; Study
of Airline’s Flight Attendants Finds More Than Half of Injuries Affect Muscles
and Bones in Back, Neck, Shoulders; A report on the Canadian
study says that the primary risk factors were the handling of passenger baggage,
the design of the galley, the design and maintenance of service trolleys, and
flight attendant seating. [Register free on-line with Flight Safety
Foundation]
Jun. 18, 2002 FAA-OSHA Aviation Safety and Health Partnership
Action Plan
Order
1110.134, Aviation Safety and Health Partnership Program Aviation Rulemaking
Committee
Apr. 16, 2002 Letter: DOT Inspector General to Congressman DeFazio
Sep. 26, 2001 Letter: DOT Inspector General to FAA
Dec. 2000 FAA-OSHA Joint Team First Report
Aug. 8, 2000 FAA-OSHA Memorandum of Understanding
Jan.–Feb. 2000 Cabin Crew Safety: Working
in, Around Aircraft Cabins Requires Awareness of Fall Prevention ;
The availability of limited data on slips, trips and falls during normal
aircraft operations complicates efforts to improve the prevention of injury to
crewmembers and passengers in the cabin environment. Nevertheless, airlines
periodically should review fall-prevention strategies and related training of
flight attendants and other workers. [Register free on-line with Flight Safety
Foundation]
Dept. of Transportation Docket (search
on Docket number FAA-2003-14578)
Jul.–Aug. 1992 Cabin Crew Safety: Aviation
Safety Programs Should Boost Occupational Safety Awareness in the Cabin; Air carriers should
consider implementing comprehensive occupational safety programs that can, in
the long run, reduce losses and increase revenues. [Register free on-line with Flight Safety
Foundation]
Nov.–Dec. 1991 Cabin Crew Safety: Carpal
Tunnel Syndrome: A Menace to Health; Repetitive wrist motions, many of which
are an intrinsic part of a flight attendant’s daily routine, can result in an
occupational disability. [Register free on-line with Flight Safety
Foundation]
Sep.–Oct. 1991 Cabin Crew Safety: Occupational
Stress in the Aircraft Cabin; Occupational demands, work
environment and atmospheric conditions all contribute to the stress of the
cabin crew member. [Register free on-line with Flight Safety
Foundation]
1975 FAA Federal Register Notice